IIRC, 6500 does not support PBR with the recursive next hops, you
must specify a directly connected next hop that you have a resolved adj for.
Tim
At 11:47 AM 2/25/2009, Dan Pinkard stated:
What are the resource limitations on policy routing on
SUP720s/MSFC3? Are the flows ultimately process switched every time
or will it draw from the route-cache?
We were toying with a very simple route-map that called for both a
next-hop and a recursive next-hop route. A moderate (20mbps/14kpps)
traffic level pegged the cpu and send IQD counters sky-high. Which
leads to the basic question of what went wrong?
Any ideas or observations from your own tests?
Thanks!
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
<https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at
<http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/>http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Tim Stevenson, [email protected]
Routing & Switching CCIE #5561
Technical Marketing Engineer, Cisco Nexus 7000
Cisco - http://www.cisco.com
IP Phone: 408-526-6759
********************************************************
The contents of this message may be *Cisco Confidential*
and are intended for the specified recipients only.
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
