Jay Hennigan wrote: > ann kok wrote: >> no ip route-cache > > This is generally NOT a good thing, other than for debugging during > low-traffic scenarios. It forces traffic to be process-switched and > will cause high (or very high) router CPU utilization.
...I had a misunderstanding about this then... I thought "no ip route-cache" forced traffic to use cef where possible. Almost makes sense that route-cache == cef :) I've only seen the "no ip route-cache" in practise once. It was years ago on a 3620 router on a PtP serial T1 link to MCI. Steve _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
