Thanks for the heads up... Are any of the maintenance releases of SXH also affected by this memory leak?
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Gert Doering Sent: Monday, March 16, 2009 10:55 AM To: Phil Mayers Cc: Gert Doering; [email protected] Subject: Re: [c-nsp] SXI leaks (was: Netflow on SUP720-3BXL) Hi, On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 03:15:01PM +0000, Phil Mayers wrote: > >(SXI has "slow memory leaks" in BGP, at least for us. Cisco case has > >been opened, but hasn't proceeded anywhere yet). > > Interesting. Do you have any details you can share? This is on a "peering point + upstream provider" router, with full IPv4 and IPv6 BGP (unicast only). SXI non-modular, "advanced ip services". We lose about 2-4 Mbyte of free memory per day, which goes into "holding" for the "BGP Router" process. It seems to be related to churn - we have another router running SXI, and that one is used at the network edge with only about 500 BGP prefixes, and nearly no churn. That one has no (noticeable) memory leak. TAC Case# is SR 610821739. (... maybe we should really go for SXI modular... - "just restart the BGP Router every 2 months, and reclaim all this memory without a 10-minute reboot... and maybe even get a bugfixed BGP-process without requiring a reboot"). gert -- USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW! //www.muc.de/~gert/ Gert Doering - Munich, Germany [email protected] fax: +49-89-35655025 [email protected]
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
