Hi. > So just a final question, would the solution have worked if it was on a > regular interface? I just want to make sure I had the right idea.
Yes, in this case the ATM-interface where the PVC lives. But the PVC must be something else than the default "ubr" class of service. The U in UBR stands for Unspecified, i.e. no QoS. Try vbr-nrt instead. -- Pelle _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
