Ziv, This works perfectly. One point to make sure - use a different group for each other group you create. The group number is used to calculate the virtual MAC assigned for the HSRP group, and you want the MACs to be different.
Arie -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ziv Leyes Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 09:56 To: Cisco Nsp Subject: [c-nsp] HSRP on Sub-interface Hi all, I know that theoretically it's supposed to be working but I must be sure it does before I implement it. I have two 7200VXR and I want to make one of the Gigabit interfaces to receive a trunk from the switch and create two sub-interfaces line the following example: Current config: interface GigabitEthernet0/1 ip address 1.1.1.2 255.255.255.0 ip address 2.2.2.2 255.255.255.0 secondary standby 0 ip 1.1.1.1 standby 0 ip 2.2.2.1 secondary ! New desired config: interface GigabitEthernet0/1 no ip address ! interface GigabitEthernet0/1.100 encapsulation dot1q 100 ip address 1.1.1.2 255.255.255.0 standby 0 ip 1.1.1.1 ! interface GigabitEthernet0/1.200 encapsulation dot1q 200 ip address 2.2.2.2 255.255.255.0 standby 1 ip 2.2.2.1 ! So my question is: will this work for sure? TIA Ziv ************************************************************************ ************ This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer viruses. ************************************************************************ ************ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
