> -----Original Message----- > From: Church, Charles [mailto:[email protected]]
> What's the purpose of having those additional addresses bound as > secondaries? It's not needed for NAT. desperate attempt to make things work I guess > I really did *not* want my first post to cisco-nsp to be this lame, > but... aghhhh... > ip nat inside source static tcp 192.168.1.103 110 x.x.x.161 110 vrf > ISP2 > extendable > > works just fine > > ip nat inside source static tcp 192.168.1.156 443 x.x.x.163 110 vrf > ISP2 > extendable > > does not work Had my head on wrong - wrong vrf. Although I don't understand at this point why it worked with the primary. Thanks for the responses... Ryan _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
