Hi, Yes, everything - including internet table, only infrastructure runs in the global one. As many have noticed the pain of getting anything going between the global table and the vrfs is just too much. All I miss now is ability to do a static route from vrf to another vrf ;-) but for now vrf import/export seems to do the trick short term ;-)
regards pshem 2009/6/18 Clue Store <[email protected]>: >> >It would be great to have a simple global-vrf route exchange feature >> though. > > > Anyone using a vrf for their global tables?? This solution could possibly > work for me but not sure what insane issues would come up by doing this. > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
