Oops. Yes of course, thanks for that! The point about distributed netflow is a good one - we'd certainly exceed the tcam limits without it
-original message- Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Sup720 vs RSP720 - Difference? From: Łukasz Bromirski <[email protected]> Date: 21/06/2009 07:58 On 2009-06-19 18:43, Phil Mayers wrote: > I see in your original post you mentioned netflow - you will probably > want to have a look through the archives for the (many, long) threads > where people document their problems with netflow on this platform. > Specifically, like the FIB, the DFCs have limited TCAM slots for netflow > entries (256k/1M on non-XL/XL) and you can over-run this TCAM if you > have a lot of traffic. Correction: NetFlow entries are 128k on non-XL and 256k on XL PFCs/DFCs. However, it's worth to note, that if the chassis is equipped with DFCs, the collection of NetFlow entries happens independently - so, theoretically, each of DFC-equipped LCs could go up to 128k if that would be DFC3B/C, or up to 256k for DFC3BXL/3CXL. http://cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/switches/ps5718/ps708/product_data_sheet09186a0080159856.html -- "Everything will be okay in the end. | Łukasz Bromirski If it's not okay, it's not the end. | http://lukasz.bromirski.net _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
