Hi, On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 09:26:13AM -0400, Jon Lewis wrote: > But isn't that the whole point of MST?
We have found MST to be mostly pointless...
"Too much hassle, too little gain"
But then, we're a service provider environment, and there are hardly
two VLANs that share the same topology - which maps very poorly to MST
instances. At the same time, there is a fairly high dynamic in adding
and removing VLANs, which is *quite* painful with MST instance
mappings...
I just wish more vendors would see the light and implement rapid-PVSTP.
Or at least PVSTP, instead of "yes, we have VLANs, and a big global single
STP" (which is really useless).
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany [email protected]
fax: +49-89-35655025 [email protected]
pgpOK9BK8mgVC.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
