Michael K. Smith - Adhost wrote: > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] [mailto:cisco-nsp- >> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Seth Mattinen >> Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2009 11:04 AM >> To: Robert VanOrmer >> Cc: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Humor: Cisco announces end of BGP >> >> Robert VanOrmer wrote: >>> Verizon: IPv6! >>> >>> >>> >>> We do have a IPv6 transport from Verizon, granted. (1) good luck >> globally >>> routing your /48 outside of VZB land, they won't do it unless your >> providing >>> a /32, and if you have been delegated any address space from an RIR, >> (2) >>> good luck getting delegated addressing from Verizon's chunk, they >> require >>> you to return any space delegated by an RIR before they will provide >> any of >>> there own. we are stuck in that Catch-22, but they are offering >> services. >>> Shows the lack of maturity in IPv6, but it's coming. >>> >> Ouch, really? I'm supposed to be turning up a new Verizon circuit this >> week or next. I guess I'll find out. I'll probably try refusing to >> accept it if they give me any BS about routing my /48 that's already >> working. >> >> ~Seth > > I'm pretty sure their policy is to not route /48's *at all*. Looking at > a 'sho bgp ipv6 regexp _701_' seems to support this. There have also > been discussions on the ARIN mailing lists to this effect. >
It's a good thing I put it in writing. ;) They didn't say anything to the contrary when I placed the order. ~Seth _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
