That and having the free IPV6 porn as a motivator sooner might have helped
too.;)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Nick Hilliard" <[email protected]>
To: "Gert Doering" <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2009 7:01 AM
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] IPV6 in general was Re: Large networks
On 27/08/2009 14:13, Gert Doering wrote:
(OTOH: if you plug your laptop with 'a random choice of IPv6-enabled
operating system' into an IPv6 only network with DHCPv6, does it work?
I seem to remember that MacOS X doesn't do any DHCPv6, just SLAAC and
mDNS...)
I'm not pointing fingers or anything: just noting that in the 12 years
that I've been poking around with ipv6, we don't yet have functional
auto-configuration - which I note in passing was one of the supposed
selling points of ipv6 in the first place.
I'm still firmly of the opinion that this problem would have been solved
years ago if the connectivity at ietf meetings was ipv6 only.
Nick
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
