Are you referring to a BGP session between your PE and a CE or the MP-BGP session between your PE's? Either way I don't think aggressive dampening is a good idea and is just a bandaid to the real underlying problem, you have instability inside your vrf's IGP, this may be due to link flapping, poor summarization, mis-configuration etc..
You need to address the issue of why you are seeing an unusual amount of updates, i've setup mpls vpns with 100+ CE's in a single domain with no excessive BGP update problem - unless there was an actual fault in the vrf IGP which was causing the BGP updates. Ben On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 3:41 PM, Ved Labs <vedl...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Team , > > any comments on this . > > Thanks, > Ved. > > On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 5:05 PM, Ved Labs <vedl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I would like to know the pros and cons for enabling the dampening for > VPNv4 > > . > > > > I can see a lot of vpnv4 routes flapping and causing the cpu shoot . > > > > Thanks, > > Ved. > > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/