Hi, On Thu, Sep 03, 2009 at 02:31:10PM -0500, Justin Shore wrote: > A third option is redistributing statics into BGP. This gives me the > opportunity to tag specific prefixes and filter them with a route-map so > I only redistribute the prefixes that I want redistributed. I can also > name static routes. I need a static route anyway to tack up the route > for outbound advertisement and to prevent loops.
That's what we do. Default is "export", and there's a tag for "no export"
(because that's something we only need very infrequently).
> The downside is that I
> hate using redistribution. I'm not a big fan of it. I've been bit too
> many times to consider redistribution a good method of doing anything.
We haven't had any issues with "static -> <anything>" redistribution.
Effectively, having a "network" statement plus a static route is not
so different - just twice the configuration effort.
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany [email protected]
fax: +49-89-35655025 [email protected]
pgpQFuQ2fmOPX.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
