On Tuesday 15 September 2009 04:39:53 am Richard A Steenbergen wrote: > Personally my recommendation for going forward is SRC > (SRC4 is pretty stable, all things considered).
Would also recommend SRC; we have it largely deployed on a number of 7200's. SRC4 is stable, but a few issues, that will be resolved in SRC5, hound us. Nothing major, probably not faced by many others... Point is, SRC is probably a more mature release. Cheers, Mark.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
