Hi, On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 10:47:17AM -0400, Jared Mauch wrote: > On Sep 14, 2009, at 10:36 AM, Gert Doering wrote: > > >On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 09:52:36AM -0400, Jared Mauch wrote: > >>While you're at it, ask for protected memory in the software. It's > >>not like ram/flash are expensive these days... > > > >Does "modular" have that? Or not yet? > > > >(I want to see modular on *all* IOS based platforms, and not as a > >somewhat-neglected step child on one specific niche platform that > >is actually fighting with another BU for line card support... or if > >that is not feasible, completely abandon IOS and provide XE or NX-OS > >on *all* platforms) > > The modular that showed up on 65xx was because 65xx saw value in it. > No other platform sees the same value, meaning no protected memory for > you.
Between your lines, I read "modular *has* protected memory", which is
a good thing - we bought $lots of 6506's last year specifically because
we wanted to run modular on it (and did not get RSP720s + 7600s).
> It's sad when you see all the effort that went into the modular over
> the years being thrown away/ignored then keep having devices crash
> with more catastrophic outcomes and no usable debugging information.
Yes. Stupid company, this one.
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany [email protected]
fax: +49-89-35655025 [email protected]
pgpdYKFL6MKNj.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
