> Does a 'sh ip route' for the /32 indicate that its being redistributed? > If you do a 'sh ip bgp nei <nei> adver' does it show it being advertised?
Below I pasted excerpts from the router. The route appears to be redistributed by the correct route-map. The STATIC-TO-BGP map proceeds to set the community string, while the OUTBOUND route-map matches on the same community string to advertise over BGP along with the networks. But as displayed with the 'sh ip nei <peer> advertised-routes' it's not displaying the host routes. I'm wondering if I missed something in the OUTBOUND route-map to not match host-routes. It appears you cannot match tags for route-maps used for advertising to peers, so I match on the community string instead. I also have send-communities configured for the upstream peer, so I believe the community string should be retained for the route when the OUTBOUND route-map is evaluated. --- snip --- # sh ip route [IP_IN_BLOCK_A] Routing entry for [IP_IN_BLOCK_A]/32 Known via "static", distance 1, metric 0 (connected) Tag 666 Redistributing via bgp [ROUTER_AS] Advertised by bgp [ROUTER_AS] route-map STATIC-TO-BGP Routing Descriptor Blocks: * directly connected, via Null0 Route metric is 0, traffic share count is 1 Route tag 666 # show ip bgp neighbors [UPSTREAM_IP] advertised-routes BGP table version is 8, local router ID is [ROUTER_IP] Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i - internal, r RIB-failure, S Stale Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path *> [BLOCK_A]/21 [ROUTER_IP] 0 150 0 i *> [BLOCK_B]/22 [ROUTER_IP] 0 150 0 i *> [BLOCK_C]/22 [ROUTER_IP] 0 150 0 i Total number of prefixes 3 _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/