> This is an interesting one. I've used 877-M and 1801-M with Be/O2 and > don't have a problem on Annex M. > > On Friday I tried both with a Tiscali (via Griffin) service and > couldn't get it to sync at Annex M. When they re-graded it to remove > the Annex M it suddenly synced, but now we are seeing pretty bad QoS, > mostly packet loss. Doesn't seem to be line (SNR) or bandwidth > related, but there is significant error correction activity on the > downstream link which I find strange. > > I have heard rumours about Cisco kit not liking the Tiscali DSLAMs but > can't find anything to back this up.
Thanks Richard, I've also heard rumours (http://piersdaniell.com/wordpress/?p=102) but as it's the blog of a chap who works for the competition I'll take it with a grain of salt! I actually wanted to use Nildram but after about 5 goes at getting compatibility info out of Nildram tech support I gave up. Looks like it'll be Be as various people have confirmed that working. Cheers for the help. Alex -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by AxTech, and is believed to be clean. _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
