Hello all, I was in the middle of the configuration of ME-3400-24TS-A (12.2(50)SE1) for port-shaping and run into interesting message:
censw(config-if)#! censw(config-if)#! censw(config-if)#interface FastEthernet0/12 censw(config-if)#service-policy output UNI-out-internet-1024kbps censw(config-if)#service-policy input UNI-in-internet-1024kbps censw(config-if)#! censw(config-if)#! censw(config-if)#interface FastEthernet0/22 censw(config-if)#service-policy output UNI-out-internet-1024kbps censw(config-if)#service-policy input UNI-in-internet-1024kbps censw(config-if)#! censw(config-if)#! censw(config-if)#interface FastEthernet0/5 censw(config-if)#service-policy output UNI-out-internet-1024kbps QoS: Configuration failed. The configured rate 1024000 bps is not achievable in hw within 1% of configuration. Closest value(s) are: 1111111 bps, 1000000 bps censw(config-if)#service-policy input UNI-in-internet-1024kbps censw(config-if)# censw(config-if)#service-policy output UNI-out-internet-1024kbps QoS: Configuration failed. The configured rate 1024000 bps is not achievable in hw within 1% of configuration. Closest value(s) are: 1111111 bps, 1000000 bps censw(config-if)#service-policy output UNI-out-internet-1024kbps QoS: Configuration failed. The configured rate 1024000 bps is not achievable in hw within 1% of configuration. Closest value(s) are: 1111111 bps, 1000000 bps The configuration of the policy-map is straightforward: policy-map UNI-out-internet-1024kbps class class-default shape average 1024000 queue-limit 272 The setting of the queue-limit is configured according to the recommendation over here: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/metro/me3400/software/release/12.2_52_se/configuration/guide/swqos.html#wp1497063 After little experimenting I figured out that when I change the policy-map to this: policy-map UNI-out-internet-1024kbps class class-default shape average 1000000 queue-limit 272 It starts to work fine. The question still remains, what does this error message actually mean, and why it got triggered when I applied the policy to the 3rd interface in a row.... Can somebody shed some light into this? Regards, Pavel Skovajsa _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/