> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:cisco-nsp- > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Peter Rathlev > Sent: Tuesday, November 03, 2009 12:01 AM > To: Ryan West > Cc: cisco-nsp > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 3560/3750 policy routing > > > It has been running IOS 12.2(50)SE1 IP Services "all its life" (some > months). > > When we started using it I was a little nervous if it would cope (and > posted on this list about it too) but it performs splendidly for us. >
I second this, 12.2(50)SE3, doing some PBR-based VoIP spliting to different SBCs, all done in HW. Note that PBR on these platforms is very limited in supported route-map match options, e.g. per cco: ******************** When configuring match criteria in a route map, follow these guidelines: -Do not match ACLs that permit packets destined for a local address. PBR would forward these packets, which could cause ping or Telnet failure or route protocol flapping. -Do not match ACLs with deny ACEs. Packets that match a deny ACE are sent to the CPU, which could cause high CPU utilization. ******************** Did your matching ACLs meet the no-deny requirement? -- deejay __________ Informacia od ESET NOD32 Antivirus, verzia databazy 4565 (20091102) __________ Tuto spravu preveril ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.sk _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
