I second the ASA's to do this.
Although I'd disagree with the ASA's having evolved from the pix's. All Cisco has appeared to do is install more bugs and try to out-do IOS and Windows ME for the buggiest OS's ever. That being said I am warming up to 7.2 train. One of my new favorite bugs- Editing an Object Group causes the ASA to crash. This seems to be something that should have been vetted. http://tools.cisco.com/Support/BugToolKit/search/getBugDetails.do?method =fetchBugDetails&bugId=CSCsy71401 That being said things are infinitely more complicated than they were back in the oh-how-I-miss-my-Pix-520 days. Mike -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ge Moua coincidently, we just did this for our wifi clients too; using an asa5550 to do the nat; works pretty decent; the asa evolved from the pix which was in its early days a nat appliance: Johnson, Neil M wrote: > I'm looking for recommendations for a device to NAT/PAT so that we can move our wireless network to private IP address space. > > We have approximately 1500 wireless clients on one wireless network and about 500 clients on the other (our campus is separated by a river). _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
