Any reason why you wouldn't go for fcoe on nexus 5k? :)
On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 6:26 AM, Jason Gurtz <[email protected]> wrote: >> Not sure that you want to go with Nexus at this point. Its got some >> really nice features, however we keep running into code bugs . Not just >> stuff that's obscure and shows up in certain situations but real show- >> stoppers like being unable to form port-channels with HP blade servers. > > Interesting assessment and sorry to hear about the microsoftish > experience. We're not intending to use blades (ESX Server 4 on a number > of HP DL380G6 is likely) and would like to do cross-box etherchannels for > redundancy. > > Jeff mentioned the 4948 of which the 10G version looks great since we're > wanting to mirror the san off-site over fiber. > > There's still a chance that fiber channel will happen though it looks like > that doesn't really make sense in this day and age. Here, vendors are > pushing the MDS9124 box. > > Thanks for the responses so far. > > ~JasonG > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
