My devices don't seem to have the unsupported-transceiver knob, so no.
________________________________________ From: Justin Shore [[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2009 11:41 AM To: Bill Blackford Cc: Scott McGrath; [email protected] Subject: Re: [c-nsp] is a DWDM SFP a DWDM SFP? Bill Blackford wrote: > I do not believe that Juniper keys their optics. My experience with this is > limited though. I am able to get third-party optics to work just fine in EX > switches. > > bblackf...@wsc-asw-02-1> show chassis hardware > Hardware inventory: > Item Version Part number Serial number Description > Chassis BH0208188142 EX3200-24T > FPC 0 REV 07 750-021261 BH0208188142 EX3200-24T, 8 POE > CPU BUILTIN BUILTIN FPC CPU > PIC 0 BUILTIN BUILTIN 24x 10/100/1000 > Base-T > PIC 1 REV 04 711-021270 AR0209216364 4x GE SFP > Xcvr 0 NON-JNPR FFX20H700284 SFP-SX > Power Supply 0 REV 02 740-020957 AT0508119769 PS 320W AC > Fan Tray Fan Tray > > As you can see it identifies the Xcvr as non-Juniper. Yeah, my J knowledge is pretty much nill. I'm going on what people with Junipers have told me. I'd love to try it out in Olive though if I could ever find a source for JunOS code that wasn't pre-hacked. > On the Cisco side, I have a Vertex 1310M GLC-LH-SM that is working fine in a > 3560G. Vertex... I will have to do some research on them. Is that with or without the unsupported-transceiver hack? Thanks for the pointer. Justin _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
