You can also have accessibility concerns if you use some of the SSL VPN
offerings. If you have low vision users it's something to consider.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Marc Haber" <mh+cisco-...@zugschlus.de>
To: <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>
Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2009 12:36 PM
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cisco VPN and 64 bit Windows
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 09:16:35PM +0100, Gert Doering wrote:
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 08:16:40PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 09:43:22AM -0800, Scott Granados wrote:
> > This is the best plan unless you want to migrate to anyconnect.
>
> What are the (dis)advantages of anyconnect?
Extra license cost, vendor lock-in, no open standard.
As if Cisco's IPSEC was particularly interoperable. Any alternatives?
Greetings
Marc
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im
Header
Mannheim, Germany | lose things." Winona Ryder | Fon: *49 621
72739834
Nordisch by Nature | How to make an American Quilt | Fax: *49 3221
2323190
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
