Totally concur. If it's not broken, don't fix it. *All* new bugs are introduced into software inadvertently while fixing existing bugs or implementing new features.
/eninja On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 1:00 PM, Gert Doering <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 11:44:39AM -0800, Thilak T wrote: > > How important or significant is to schedule reloads of Data Center > /Campus > > switches with uptime over 1 year ? What is the logic/reason behind this > > advice from Cisco. > > We never reload anything, unless a *specific* reason exists - e.g. > "software > update unavoidable" or "device misbehaving and we can't find any non-reload > way to mitigate". > > gert > -- > USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW! > // > www.muc.de/~gert/ <http://www.muc.de/%7Egert/> > Gert Doering - Munich, Germany > [email protected] > fax: +49-89-35655025 > [email protected] > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
