On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 11:00 AM, Seth Mattinen <[email protected]> wrote: > Dobbins, Roland wrote: >> >>> Flexibility (tends to favor eor - any service at any port) >> >> Strongly disagree - service switches are the answer for this. > > I'm not aware of a TOR switch that can provide PRI, POTS or other > non-Ethernet service that a customer could want if you're in a > colocation situation.
You can stack ISR's with 3750's to accomplish this. But in a non-colo situation, why not use copper/fiber distribution like Panduit's quicknet stuff back to a centralized chassis or stackable switching area? -- Eric _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
