I have TWC Residential in NYC, and I can fling packets back and forth no
problem.
from TWC to remote host:{1720, 1863}: works fine.
from remote host to TWC:{1720, 1863}: works fine.
Both TCP and UDP.
oo
On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 3:35 PM, Tony Varriale <[email protected]>wrote:
> Residental or business service?
>
> tv
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "abs" <[email protected]>
> To: "Ziv Leyes" <[email protected]>; "Jared Mauch" <[email protected]>
>
> Cc: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Thursday, December 24, 2009 2:07 PM
>
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] RESOLVED: Port 1720 & 1863
>
>
> Seems like everyone is interested in knowing the ISP.
> And the winner is..... Time Warner Cable. They are also doing the same for
> port 1863.
>
> --- On Thu, 12/24/09, Jared Mauch <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> From: Jared Mauch <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] RESOLVED: Port 1720 & 1863
> To: "Ziv Leyes" <[email protected]>
> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> Date: Thursday, December 24, 2009, 9:37 AM
>
> It may be worthwhile to name & shame the provider for intercepting your
> h.323 directed traffic.
>
> (Unless of course you're in one of those countries that uses high telecom
> rates to justify blocking VoIP).
>
> - Jared
>
> On Dec 24, 2009, at 3:20 AM, Ziv Leyes wrote:
>
> Oh, man, that's dirty, why would they do that??
>> Just when it started to get interesting...
>> But I'm glad for you that the issue is resolved
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [email protected] [mailto:
>> [email protected]] On Behalf Of abs
>> Sent: Thursday, December 24, 2009 3:01 AM
>> To: Steve Bertrand
>> Cc: [email protected]
>> Subject: [c-nsp] RESOLVED: Port 1720 & 1863
>>
>> thank you all for your help. for the folks interested the issue was that
>> the two ports are being intercepted by my ISP. once again thank you all for
>> you help
>>
>> cheers,
>> abs
>>
>> --- On Wed, 12/23/09, Steve Bertrand <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> From: Steve Bertrand <[email protected]>
>> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Port 1720 & 1863
>> To: "abs" <[email protected]>
>> Date: Wednesday, December 23, 2009, 7:49 PM
>>
>> abs wrote:
>>
>>> Now this makes a lot more sense. i was going crazy trying to figure
>>> this out. I think they are doing the same for port 1863.
>>>
>>> It would be greatly appreciated if you could setup a vm for me to run
>>> some scans off of.
>>>
>>
>> No problem.
>>
>> I've got to finish up writing some code right now, so I'll get the vm
>> set up first thing tomorrow before I'm done for the week.
>>
>> Hopefully you're familiar with FreeBSD, as that is what the host will be.
>>
>> All I ask is that you *only* probe hosts that are your own. I'm an ISP,
>> and I've been burned before after being taken advantage of after doing
>> favours like this.
>>
>> Believe it or not, I'm not generally a trusting person, but that is
>> generally outweighed my desire to help others.
>>
>> So, with that understanding, and the understanding that you can do
>> whatever you want within the vm so long as there is no network abuse,
>> I'll get things configured, and send you the detail in the morning so
>> that you can SSH into the box via IPv4 and IPv6.
>>
>> Cheers!
>>
>> Steve
>>
>> ps. it would likely be kind to reply your original post to the cisco-nsp
>> list with [RESOLVED] in the subject, just so the others who were
>> following the thread can rest assured that all is well and good with you
>> ;)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ************************************************************************************
>> This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
>> PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer
>> viruses.
>>
>> ************************************************************************************
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ************************************************************************************
>> This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
>> PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer
>> viruses.
>>
>> ************************************************************************************
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
