Hi Pete,

Thanks for your response, I think you've confirmed our suspicions.  We'll
source another chassis:)

James G

-----Original Message-----
From: Pete Templin [mailto:peteli...@templin.org] 
Sent: 24 January 2010 19:00
To: James Greig
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 6509 problem

James Greig wrote:
> Anyone else have any other thoughts on this?  Could it be a bug or a
faulty
> backplane on the 6500 chassis?

It looks similar to what I got when I toasted a chassis in November.  I 
didn't capture the console output, but basically the primary Sup was OK 
but the rest were all MAJOR failures.

pt


_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Reply via email to