On 30 Jan 2010, at 17:59, Pavel Skovajsa wrote: > Cisco quickly found out that you cannot do much "sophisticated" stuff > with cards above and came with ES product line for service provider > segment - which is the ES20 and newer ES+ > (http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/solutions/Enterprise/Video/tpqoscampus.html#wp1072698).
If you are going to spend the money on ES, a few words of warning about ES-20. It is very limited in terms of what the card can actually do in terms of QoS (for example, there's no tuneable Tc for any policy) - additionally, everything needs to be under a class-default on sub-interfaces for example. We found that this has severely limited a number of QoS deployments that we've tried to do. SIP-400 is actually better than ES-20 - I'd look at ES+20/ES+40 for your requirements. LAN cards don't seem the best way to go if you need such strict control. However, I'd put together a strict statement of requirements and get Cisco to demonstrate that the card meets your demands before you go forward. The 7600 platform can have a nasty habit of biting you back. I can probably share more details of the ES off-list if you need them! Cheers, Rob -- Rob Shakir <[email protected]> Network Development Engineer GX Networks/Vialtus Solutions ddi: +44208 587 6077 mob: +44797 155 4098 pgp: 0xc07e6deb nic-hdl: RJS-RIPE This email is subject to: http://www.vialtus.com/disclaimer.html _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
