On (2010-02-09 15:11 +0100), Manu Chao wrote: > new ASR are better ;)
Indeed, but of course 7400, ASR1k and ASR9k have nothing in common while name might suggest so, so 'new ASR' is bit stretching it. ASR1k is popey/QFP which is cisco IP, AFAIK based on tensilica di570t, running IOS as process on top of linux. ASR9k is EZchip NP(3c|4), which is 3rd party NPU with fabric is from nexus7k, running IOS-XR on top of QNX obviously. 7400 is plain old IOS, purely software router today as toaster/PXF cannot be enabled. I think ASR1k is very interesting platform for some applications while ASR9k as it is today is overshadowed by MX. CSCO will have to work hard to bridge the gap. > > On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 2:45 PM, Saku Ytti <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On (2010-02-09 14:30 +0100), Phibee Network Operation Center wrote: > > > > > i am search a real information on the Cisco 7401ASR : > > > If you have one units ;=) > > > > > > I want know if this cisco are same performence that the > > > Cisco 7204 with a NPE 400 ? > > > > ASR was the second product to be blessed (or cursed) with toaster > > chip a.k.a PXF. > > Like first product NSE-1 it was failure and newer software will disable and > > won't allow enabling PXF, so everything will be software switched, like in > > NPE400, performance is below NPE300. > > > > > He support MPLS, Interworking and EoMPLS > > > > > > It's the same IOS that Cisco 7204 ? > > > > No. Also it is EOL platform and as price for gray NPE300 is ridiculously > > small I personally wouldn't accept even free ASR's. > > > > -- > > ++ytti > > _______________________________________________ > > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > > -- ++ytti _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
