On 12/02/10 14:47, Rob Shakir wrote:
This seems quite accurate to me. Our experience of ISSU has been terrible. We've found multiple bugs related to it, and have found that -- in general -- we're much better off in terms of service disruption with a "classic" upgrade (upgrade secondary, reload peer, force failover, etc). Cisco advised us that it is unlikely that ISSU on 7600/6500 will meet our requirements, and hence we are better off doing classic upgrades. We've taken their advice, and will not be trying it again. I think
As it happens I just did a "half-test" on one of our boxes where I did the "issu loadversion" so that I could see what it told me about outage times - and all kinds of horrific messages started spraying onto the console about missing ifindex values, IDB failures and so forth.
I quickly did an "issu abortversion" Bah. Thanks a lot Cisco... _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
