On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 1:59 PM, Tim Stevenson <tstev...@cisco.com> wrote: > As you probably know, n7k today has a 128K FIB TCAM, inadequate to hold full > routes anyway. Near-term we will have an XL card that holds 900K prefixes. > In that case, you should not run out of FIB TCAM in the case you describe, > but as always, you should be sure not to "miss" configuring route limits & > filters to avoid issues, that's clearly best practice. > > Hope that helps, > Tim
Yes, thanks. -- Tim:> _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
