Thanks... it's definitely not the issue described though ;) Can you share more on the platform itself? What supervisor, memory etc?
-----Original Message----- From: Andy B. [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2010 12:29 PM To: Paul Stewart Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Long list of route-maps On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 6:27 PM, Paul Stewart <[email protected]> wrote: > Why a route-map PER peer? Can you not group them under the same conditions > and simplify things a bit? > BGP communities for my customers. They can decide to whom we announce (actually prepend or no-export) their prefixes. I want as much granularity as possible, that is why there is a route-map per peer. _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
