On 15/03/2010, at 5:54 AM, <[email protected]> 
<[email protected]> wrote:

>>> These days you can get cheap twinax 10G cables with SFP+ at the ends
>> to
>>> connect two Cisco switches or two Procurves. Short distance only of
>>> course, but very cheap.
> 
> They're also useful for connecting servers to top-of-rack 10G switches.
> 
> But curiously, they're currently unsupported by Cisco on the Nexus 7000 
> platform:
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/switches/ps9441/ps9402/ps9512/Data_Sheet_C78-437757.html

they are currently unsupported on N7K for good reasons that are technical.  
strongly suggest that you don't use it for a production environment.

> 
> They seem to work fine in this application, however.

suggest you do "shut" on one side of the link and see if the other end notices 
the link is down.


>> As far as I'm aware, HP are particularly crappy about vendor locking
>> their
>> transceiver ports and will refuse to drive any "third party"
>> transceiver.
> 
> There's no problem using a Cisco SFP+ cable in an HP *server*

depends on the 'server'.
for a NIC/CNA - yes.
for any HP blade (embedded switch): HP require HP transceivers and don't 
provide any "unsupported transceiver" at all.


> 
>>> Also, twinax SFP+ are manufacturer-specific. Is it possible to get a
>>> twinax-cable with a Cisco-coded SFP+ at one end and a Procurve-coded
>>> SFP+ at the other?
> 
> This might not be necessary.  Network World recently did a 10G switch review:
> http://www.networkworld.com/reviews/2010/011810-ethernet-switch-test.html
> 
> One of the documents linked from the review was the vendor features 
> questionnaire.  In it, Cisco said:
> 
>     Nexus 5000 also provides interoperability support for non-Cisco
>     Twinax cabling.  Supported vendors include EMC, IBM, HP StorageWorks
>     and NetApp
> 
> This, and an emailed promise from an HP rep are the only inter-vendor twinax 
> support claims I've seen to date.  I'm hopeful that vendors will come to 
> their senses on pluggables, at least for twinax cabling.

HP are currently locking in to HP transceivers.  email promise or not, thats 
the current behaviour.


cheers,

lincoln.


_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Reply via email to