AFAIK, FIB and LFIB are just not the same table and the MSFC distributes the routing information in both tables to the PFC3B(XL).
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 9:30 PM, Tim Durack <[email protected]> wrote: > Having a hard time figuring this out. I have a vrf with around 30k > prefixes (partial Internet.) > > Sup720-3BXL shows: > > RTR-2#sh mls cef summary detail > > Total routes: 58231 > IPv4 unicast routes: 29043 > IPv4 non-vrf routes: 89 > IPv4 non-vrf routes (internal): 0 > IPv4 vrf routes: 28943 > IPv4 vrf routes (internal): 11 > IPv4 Multicast routes: 5 > MPLS routes: 28849 > IPv6 unicast routes: 330 > IPv6 non-vrf routes: 6 > IPv6 non-vrf routes (internal): 0 > IPv6 vrf routes: 69 > IPv6 vrf routes (internal): 255 > IPv6 multicast routes: 3 > EoM routes: 1 > > What are "IPv4 vrf routes" as opposed to "MPLS routes"? > > Looks like the prefixes count twice from a fib perspective. Is that > correct? > > -- > Tim:> > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
