On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 10:33 AM, Jens Link <[email protected]> wrote: > Drew Weaver <[email protected]> writes: > >> Hi, >> >> I believe most people feel that a /126 should be used the same place you >> would use /30 > > Many people feel that a /64 should be used as smallest network size for > IPv6 even on point-to-point links.
Unfortunately the standard wasn't forceful enough so people wouldn't be able to use smaller than /64 prefixes, which would halve the IPv6 prefix length. As of now, where it's legal to use /112 or /126 and the IPv6 prefix length is up to 128 bits, it's not worth to use /64 unless EUI addressing is in place. Rubens _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
