Correct, the WS-X67xx are LAN based cards, and are not "supposed" to be used in SP environment. There are cards especially targeted for that - especially ES40/ES20+ with their EVC stuff. Of course they only work on C7600, and of course they are expensive as hell.
For more info see [1] -pavel skovajsa [1] http://markmail.org/message/otbacj6qrpmxzndj#query:cisco%20ES40+page:1+mid:gdg6e4vca27whplb+state:results On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 3:00 PM, Michael Robson <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 10 Mar 2010, at 18:56, Arie Vayner (avayner) wrote: > >> Michael, >> >> For QOS: >> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst6500/ios/12.2SX/con >> figuration/guide/mplsqos.html >> >> For TE (and MPLS in general) check: >> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst6500/ios/12.2SX/con >> figuration/guide/pfc3mpls.html >> > > These documents mention no reference to TE for EoMPLS: is it safe to assume > therefore that the 650 doesn't support tE for EoMPLS? > > Am I also correct in saying that, since outgoing policies are not support on > 6500s for LAN-based cards, there is no real way to give shape or restrict > EoMPLS pseudowire bandwidths by EXP/TC field? > > > Thanks, > > > Michael. > -- > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
