[email protected] wrote: >> Q: IPv6 auto-configuration on p-t-p core links: Good or bad idea? I >> guess the downside is comparable to using RFC1918 addresses on Internet >> core router's interfaces, where e.g. traces break. > > Why on earth would you want to use anything other than static IPv6 > addresses for your p-t-p core links? >
Another fun twist on this is unnumbered global (or even completely link local) > Get your own IPv6 prefix and start your testing with that. It's easy. Agree, get them whilst they are hot... _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
