Ack....EoMPLS/L2TPV3 type deployments scale much better than
bridge-groups (aka: legacy bridging).
Rodney
On 3/27/10 10:50 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
On Sat, 27 Mar 2010, neal rauhauser wrote:
Yes, I have to bridge. I've looked at it every which way, we're replacing
It'd probably make more sense to use xconnect over either IP or MPLS in
your case, than trying to bridge the traffic. This will do the same
thing but will avoid having to use bridge-groups.
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
