On 16/04/2010, at 8:19 PM, Dobbins, Roland wrote: > On Apr 16, 2010, at 4:38 PM, Tom Lanyon wrote: > >> A 3845 lists at 256Mbps and a 3945 at 502Mbps in the routing performance >> throughput tables, but I am interested in how much of that people are >> actually seeing... > > Note that this is going to be highly situationally-dependent based upon many > factors, including traffic types, configuration details, pps, & packet-size.
Of course; I was merely hoping for others' experiences in such varied real-world situations. > Also, throughput (i.e., pps) throughout the performance envelope is actually > a more important and relevant metric than bandwidth (i.e., bps). Well, some experience with pps as well as bps in such situations would also be helpful. :) Regards, Tom _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
