Hi, On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 10:02:34PM -0400, Paul Stewart wrote: > Has anyone studied how much faster BGP peer groups are on very loaded > routers? I have a customer that I'm doing work with currently that has > about 300 BGP peers on a Sup720/7613 box. Downstream customers take about > 10 minutes to receive a full routing table.
With current IOS versions, peer group don't bring any performance advantages
(as peers with identical output policies get grouped into "update-groups"
automatically).
OTOH, peer-groups / peer-templates are nice to reduce the size of your
router configuration, so for us, it's still worth using them.
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany [email protected]
fax: +49-89-35655025 [email protected]
pgpvsThdx5asx.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
