How about power outage in the data center
> 9. Re: nexus 5xx vpc peer keepalives (Lincoln Dale) Message: 9 > Date: Sun, 2 May 2010 16:54:39 +1000 > From: Lincoln Dale <[email protected]> > To: "<[email protected]>" <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] nexus 5xx vpc peer keepalives > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > On 01/05/2010, at 10:09 PM, <[email protected]> < > [email protected]> wrote: > > It hasn't given me any surprises. TAC reviewed it, told me I should be > fine, didn't seem to share my (or the OP's) concern about making the > keepalive robust. > > the L3 (IP) based vPC keepalive is purely intended to assist in dealing > with split-brain if the vPC peer-link is non-functional. > > having simultaneous failure of both would be an unusual circumstance, > particularly if you follow best-practice on the vPC peer-link itself.. > > > cheers, > > lincoln. > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list > [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > > End of cisco-nsp Digest, Vol 90, Issue 2 > **************************************** > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
