FYI, we were recently told by TAC that 12.2SXF17 on the 6500 is EOL'd and they will not provide support or fix a known bug we have encountered. We were told to upgrade to 12.2SXI3. However, this same train isn't available and we were advised to look at 12.2(33)SRE. Up to this point we had tried to stay on the same 12.2SX versions on both our 6500's and 7600's that both use sup7203bxl's. Todd
________________________________ From: [email protected] on behalf of Rick Kunkel Sent: Thu 5/6/2010 11:42 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Sup7203BXL in 7600 versus 6509 Thanks for the input folks... This is indeed 12.2SXF so it looks like I'm good.... Thanks! Rick On Thu, 6 May 2010, Peter Rathlev wrote: > On Thu, 2010-05-06 at 10:55 -0700, Rick Kunkel wrote: >> Probalby a silly question... I've done some cursory looking, and figured >> it might just be quicker to ask... > > It often is, but it can stir up some trouble asking. :-) > >> Will a Sup7203BXL from a 7600 drop nicely into a 6509 with no changes to >> the IOS? (The 6509 has necessary high speed fan tray, power supplies, and >> all that jazz.) > > They're interchangeable, though only IOS 12.2SXF works on both. So if it > runs 12.2SR as a 7600 now, you would have to downgrade to 12.2SXF to > make it work in a 6500 cabinet. You could then upgrade to SXH/SXI from > there. > > Please don't ask why SR doesn't work in a 6500 cabinet, which is > technically probably extremely much like a 7600 cabinet save a sticker > somewhere. :-) > > -- > Peter > > > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
