On 24/05/2010, at 12:02 AM, Mark Tinka wrote: >> Cisco said they are >> working on getting the old features added back in as a >> feature enhancement later on. > > Eeek - CoPP is a good workaround but seems like too much > muscle for a simple task like this. > > Well, at least the "IOS-way" will make it into NX-OS. But > keep bugging them, you know how they can be :-).
indeed, vty access-class is on its way. the irony is that CoPP is actually a superior solution to the problem, as CoPP is enforced in the h/w forwarding path - whereas a vty access-class is applied in software once the packets have already hit the control-plane. reality is that having both would be best-of-both-worlds. cheers, lincoln. _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
