On 5/24/10 3:16 PM, Skeeve Stevens wrote: > If it requires an NDA or me having to talk to Cisco to find out this basic > information, then I will drop Cisco off the list for consideration as you > rightly point out, the others all provide this detail upfront. > > How does Cisco expect us to sell them as a superior product against other > vendors if the information is not available? >
You have to give them credit where it's due: Cisco is very good about providing all kinds of docs compared to, for example, Brocade. I could never imagine buying a Brocade product if I have to pay to read a manual. I'm really big on researching things myself. Cisco is not good at other things like disclosing the true capabilities of QoS on the 3560/3750 switches (as a downgrade from the 3550) and buffers. ~Seth _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
