In IS-IS the LSP is relayed as it is so if R1 received LSP from R0 it will send it as it is to the appropriate level adjacency, so if LSP authentication is configured on R0 the Authentication TLV will be attached to R0's LSPs thus any router receiving this LSP must be able to either authenticate it or discard it.
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 11:10 PM, Arne Larsen / Region Nordjylland < [email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi all. > > Can someone tell me what might be wrong. I have a router connected with 2 > neighbors ( R2 ). > > Setup.: - R0 - R1 - R2 - R3 > > The isis routing process on R2 don't see any L2-routes from R1, but R1 has > L2 routes. > R2 can se L2 routes from R3, and R1 an see L2 routes from R0. The three > routes R0, R2 & R3 has a domain passwd on the isis process, but R1 hasn't. > Can this miss configuration do this, I thought that the password protected > the process full. > > > /Arne > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > -- Best Regards, Mounir Mohamed, CCIE No.19573 (R&S, SP) Senior Network Engineer, Core Team. NOOR Data Networks, SAE Mobile# +2-010-2345-956 http://mounirmohamed.wordpress.com http://www.linkedin.com/in/mounirmohamed _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
