On 2010-06-25 23:34, Rudy Setiawan wrote:
We implemented 2 new routers with the following devices/modules:
core2:: 2 4 CEF720 4 port 10-Gigabit Ethernet WS-X6704-10GE 5 2 Supervisor Engine 720 (Active) WS-SUP720-3B
border2#sh mod 2 4 CEF720 4 port 10-Gigabit Ethernet WS-X6704-10GE 5 2 Supervisor Engine 720 (Active) WS-SUP720-3BXL
This customer is having an issue where it can not pull more than 150Mbps inbound. But from our existing network (2Gbps uplinks), he can pull 1.2 Gbps of inbound no problem.
What is the traffic load over the 6704 interfaces? Have you crossed by any means the TCAM capacity of the PFC3B of the Core2? Can you share 'sh platform hardware capacity forwarding'? With the new (SXH onwards) code, the TCAM after experiencing exception when the FIB doesn't fit TCAMs on the PFC anymore, will program the mls rate-limiter to forward only at the level of 10kpps for traffic punted via RP, and the TCAM exception can be cleared only by reloading the box. I.e. when you did in past overflow the TCAMs, I'd look into it closely. -- "Everything will be okay in the end. | Łukasz Bromirski If it's not okay, it's not the end." | http://lukasz.bromirski.net _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
