Hi Felix,
I can't speak for Hughes as I've never had the experience of wuking with
the gear but we are currently evaluating iDirect for our Distance
Learning Network(USPNET) of which a heavy component is VOIP, Video
Conferencing, Video Multicast streaming. Our setup is a typical
hub/spoke topology covering 12 Pacific Countries. Now Compare to our
current satellite platform we use, I really like iDirect for two reasons:
1.) QOS provisioning mechanisms (Simple Methodology and configuration,
don't have to worry about Satellite TimeSlots correlation etc)
2.) iDirect Monitoring/System Visibility (Gives us real time info of
what is happening at the IP layer plus its correation to RF)
There are many more reasons i can name but these two I see as a trump
card compared to other systems I've worked on.
Terry
On 15/07/2010 10:16 PM, Felix Nkansah wrote:
Hi,
I am evaluating which of these satellite offerings provide the best IPoVSAT
technology.
The network would heavily use IP Voice and IP Video conferencing among the
VSAT connected locations in a hub/spoke fashion.
My client (a government agency) intends on installing/managing their own
VSAT hub based on either Hughes or iDirect.
I wanted to know which of these providers ensure the best performance of IP?
Felix
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
