Maybe something like below document
Route Leaking from a Global Routing Table into a VRF and Route Leaking
from a VRF into a Global Routing Table
=====================================================================
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk436/tk832/technologies_configuration_example09186a0080231a3e.shtml#global
Shimol
On 7/16/10 9:17 AM, Jeff Bacon wrote:
I have a mesh of 6500s connected via various gig fiber links. The 6500s
have multiple VRFs defined, but of course most things interesting live
in the global zone.
I want a host on a VRF on a 6500 to be able to connect to another
destination that is reachable through the global zone. Most likely it
will be on the same 6500, but ideally it would be the same one way or
the other.
Basically, how do you leak routes between VRF and global? Between VRF
and VRF I get. VRF<>global, not so clear; "MPLS fundamentals" provides a
couple of examples but it's aimed more at a "how to connect VRF to
internet so you have one static global route entry... ick.
I can see the possible solution of creating a GRE tunnel within the
switch itself, with one end in the VRF and the other end in the global
and using "tun vrf" to get them to link, but this seems just a shade
ugly (though it also happens to provide a nice fixed point in space for
applying ACLs, etc.)
Or of course there's the "hairpin" solution. I might be able to live
with that, probably better than the GRE answer... but that doesn't mean
I have to like it, does it? :)
Thanks,
-bacon
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
