We switched to MX about a year ago. A pair of MX-240 routers.
Price and maintenance costs were the factors that drove us towards switching to
Juniper.
Honestly, after a year of living with them, even if they cost the same as
Cisco, I'd still go for the Junipers.
----- Original Message ---------------
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Juniper M320 vs. 7600/SUP320-3BXL and WS-X6148A-GE-TX
From: Tim Jackson <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 19:05:53 -0500
To: Paul Stewart <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected],
[email protected]
>Same story here..
>
>About to roll out more MX, but so far so good...
>
>On Jul 28, 2010 3:15 PM, "Paul Stewart" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>Yes, I'd like to throw in that we are migrating to pure MX in our core ..
>and moving out of 7600 platform (sup720-3bxl). This is partly price related
>although BGP performance (scanner) was the driving force on this decision.
>Also, for MPLS the price/features to deploy was much more attractive to us
>on the MX series too.
>
>We have some of the MX up and running now and extremely pleased in
>comparison. Juniper isn't perfect nor is Cisco - for our needs the move to
>MX for core BGP/MPLS appears to have been a really good choice.
>
>Paul
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: [email protected]
>[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck....
>_______________________________________________
>cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
