Dzień dobry Pshem-- I have not used service policies on routing switches, however, I do frequently on routers. A common suggestion is that you do not use "any" in your ACL. Try using a subnet for matching.
cjw > Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 11:21:12 +1200 > From: Pshem Kowalczyk <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Subject: [c-nsp] 3750 and L3 service policies > Message-ID: > <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > Hi, > > We had to deploy some L3 service policies on a WS-C3750E-24TD. After > the config was put in place we could see it working on the interface, > but according the the statistics on the input route-map - there was > nothing matching at all. > Is that expected? The switch runs only as a L2 switch, except for that > single access list. > > software: 12.2(44)SE1 > > class-map match-all CLASS_SLAP > match access-group name ACL_SLAP > > policy-map POLICY_SLAP > class CLASS_SLAP > police 80000000 128000 exceed-action drop > > ip access-list extended ACL_SLAP > deny tcp any eq www any > permit ip any any > > kind regards > pshem _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
